Started again, this time with John Bolton at the helm.
US pulled out of Iran's nuclear deal last year because it had other plans. After the recent false-flag sabotaging a US oil tanker in Port Fujairah, stories are swirling like filth around the drain .... that US has despatched one of its aircraft carriers and several B-52 bombers in the Persian Gulf. It's aranging to send at least 100,000 additional forces to the Middle-East "fearing an attack" from Iran on US troops in Iraq. US State Deppartment is telling all of its non-emergency staff in Baghdad to leave the country. John Bolton is vigorously scratching his own butt-cheeks and accusing Iran of hacking his rear.
Netanyahu is over the moon! He knows he has complete backing of all gulf leaders.
What next in such false-flag soaps? You can expect just about anything self-inflicted such as a US patrol boat or some US forces on the ground in the gulf region firing a few quick shots killing one of their own, igniting the final rumpus awaited for an armed conflict.
Failing miserably in Syria and Venezuela, something catastrophic elsewhere was necessary to stay on the job.
Such periodical saber rattling is among the latest US-Israeli political culture. Just as TelAviv bombs Gaza twice every year as a sport, Washington (monitored by TelAviv) has this distasteful tantrum for "regime change" in Iran at least once in the 4-year-term of every supposedly 'elected' killer in the WH. Both these buggers are aware that the relation of the Iranian government with by far the majority of its people is strongly bonded, based on a firmly rooted ideology which makes the situation on the ground very different from countries like pre-war Iraq and Libya for instance. So, the war drums for "regime change" in Iran are played once every year or two to poke Iran and rattle the world; then the jingoism fizzles out discreetly, inconclusively and spinelessly. Pre-empt frenzy remains dormant until the ego whips up its next bout of madness. These barbarians have nothing to do with the human race.
At the moment, even a super lowlife like David Frum, GWB's former speechwriter who fervently supported the Iraq war and penned the phrase "axis of evil" is getting cold feet at the thought of a war with Iran. He said recently that war with Iran would be a disaster. They're all crapping bricks at the very thought of attacking Iran, and presently that isn't too heartening for the international media.
Occupation of Iran is seen as killing two birds with one stone. First, catering to the wishes of TelAviv. Second, America cannot stop reminiscing the days of the Shah when Iran's vast natural resources & wealth were controlled by Washington. With the Shah getting his bit of commission, Washington was minting stolen money at mind boggling proportions! The WH would sell their moms to get those days back again.
An armed combat with a country like Iran isn't the sort of strategy the Zionist ideology is cut-out to cope with. Zionism instills bullying and the element of cowardice is unimaginably high. Its idea of a 'real war' is pouncing on defenseless lands and communities which have no army and no weapons except for homemade rudimentary catapults and pebbles. Then only does the Israeli army feel totally confident with a $3b annual upgrade on state-of-the-art military hardware from the US, so that they can kill, kill and kill with no casualties on their side. They know it won't be like that if armed conflict breaks out with Iran. Though the Israeli army maybe stronger, yet, if for every 10 Iranians killed by Israel, Iran responds and kills 5 of theirs would be too demoralizing, frightening and unacceptable for the Zionist state. That's the reason Israel hasn't spoken of another war with Hezb'Allah after the one in 2006 despite the former's seething hatred for the latter. And that's the reason why Frum and his likes are hellishly worried for Israel if US is stupid enough to attack.
US intrusion in Iran would mean a gateway for Israel too, as we have already seen in Syria. Since 2011 Israel has fired over 150 missiles into Syria. Many have landed in Damascus. But Israeli missiles landing in Tehran, pre-planned and pre-emptive, could be a very different story for TelAviv.
Netanyahu is over the moon! He knows he has complete backing of all gulf leaders.
What next in such false-flag soaps? You can expect just about anything self-inflicted such as a US patrol boat or some US forces on the ground in the gulf region firing a few quick shots killing one of their own, igniting the final rumpus awaited for an armed conflict.
Failing miserably in Syria and Venezuela, something catastrophic elsewhere was necessary to stay on the job.
Such periodical saber rattling is among the latest US-Israeli political culture. Just as TelAviv bombs Gaza twice every year as a sport, Washington (monitored by TelAviv) has this distasteful tantrum for "regime change" in Iran at least once in the 4-year-term of every supposedly 'elected' killer in the WH. Both these buggers are aware that the relation of the Iranian government with by far the majority of its people is strongly bonded, based on a firmly rooted ideology which makes the situation on the ground very different from countries like pre-war Iraq and Libya for instance. So, the war drums for "regime change" in Iran are played once every year or two to poke Iran and rattle the world; then the jingoism fizzles out discreetly, inconclusively and spinelessly. Pre-empt frenzy remains dormant until the ego whips up its next bout of madness. These barbarians have nothing to do with the human race.
At the moment, even a super lowlife like David Frum, GWB's former speechwriter who fervently supported the Iraq war and penned the phrase "axis of evil" is getting cold feet at the thought of a war with Iran. He said recently that war with Iran would be a disaster. They're all crapping bricks at the very thought of attacking Iran, and presently that isn't too heartening for the international media.
Occupation of Iran is seen as killing two birds with one stone. First, catering to the wishes of TelAviv. Second, America cannot stop reminiscing the days of the Shah when Iran's vast natural resources & wealth were controlled by Washington. With the Shah getting his bit of commission, Washington was minting stolen money at mind boggling proportions! The WH would sell their moms to get those days back again.
An armed combat with a country like Iran isn't the sort of strategy the Zionist ideology is cut-out to cope with. Zionism instills bullying and the element of cowardice is unimaginably high. Its idea of a 'real war' is pouncing on defenseless lands and communities which have no army and no weapons except for homemade rudimentary catapults and pebbles. Then only does the Israeli army feel totally confident with a $3b annual upgrade on state-of-the-art military hardware from the US, so that they can kill, kill and kill with no casualties on their side. They know it won't be like that if armed conflict breaks out with Iran. Though the Israeli army maybe stronger, yet, if for every 10 Iranians killed by Israel, Iran responds and kills 5 of theirs would be too demoralizing, frightening and unacceptable for the Zionist state. That's the reason Israel hasn't spoken of another war with Hezb'Allah after the one in 2006 despite the former's seething hatred for the latter. And that's the reason why Frum and his likes are hellishly worried for Israel if US is stupid enough to attack.
US intrusion in Iran would mean a gateway for Israel too, as we have already seen in Syria. Since 2011 Israel has fired over 150 missiles into Syria. Many have landed in Damascus. But Israeli missiles landing in Tehran, pre-planned and pre-emptive, could be a very different story for TelAviv.
Additionally, India and the United States signed the logistics pact in 2016 allowing US to use Indian military bases via the LEMOA agreement ( Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement).
Comments
Post a Comment
For all general Q&A visit the following link @ Zainab's Lounge.
http://zainabslounge.blogspot.ca/2016/09/muslim-villa-guests-introduction-prior.html (Copy & paste link on browser)