This narration of the altered Bible is flabbergasting. It goes to the extent of slandering Prophet Noah as a drunkard.
'An Eye-Opening Biblical Narration'
By Ibn Anwar
Bismika Allahumma
The following is one of the most interesting Biblical stories I have came across. I thought I’d share it with the readers. Many Christians such as Sam Shamoun, Craig Winn and others simply love going around bad-mouthing the Qur’an, saying that it contains “perverted, nonsensical teachings”.
Let us have a glimpse of their “sensical” Bible.
“And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham [is] the father of Canaan. These [are] the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. And Noah began [to be] an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid [it] upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces [were] backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; the lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers.“ Genesis 9:18-25 - New version
Before I proceed further I would like to state for the record that Muslims are utterly shocked and offended that the Bible portrays great messengers of God as low-live drunkards.
Coming back to the story, notice how the story says Ham, THE FATHER of Canaan. This is rather interesting. Seems like it’s trying to prove or lead to something.
In summary, Noah became drunk and dropped naked in his tent. Ham, Noah’s second son found him in that state and told his brothers about it. According to many Biblical experts, Ham didn’t just tell his brothers about it, he also laughed at his father’s state. This is considered as an offense to Noah and is the reason why Noah made the curse. The two other sons Shem and Japheth were ashamed of their father’s nakedness and covered him without looking. When Noah gained consciousness, he knew what Ham did and started cursing, “And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers.”
Did you catch the joke?
Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth.
Ham had four sons: Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan.
When the narration is analysed, a question arises: “Who was responsible for looking at Noah’s nakedness?” The answer is Ham. Christians argue that the action of Ham was a sin, hence the curse. For the sake of argument, we agree. Yet, who was responsible and thereafter cursed? Ham was responsible, but, who was made to pay? Was it Ham? No. Canaan, an innocent little child, was made to pay for the error of Ham. The father who is responsible was reprieved and the son who’s innocent was punished. Furthermore, why was Canaan out of four siblings singled out? Is this justice or madness?
Can you imagine something like that happening today? I love analogies, so let us have one.
James has four children. He committed murder. He is apprehended, brought to court and is found guilty. The judge decided that the punishment is the “injection”, i.e. death. However, the injection is given to his youngest son and he in turn is released without cost.
Once again, is this justice or madness? I leave the verdict to the readers.
In addition, read for yourself how blatantly the above strange tale of Genesis 9:18-25 contradicts the values of a narration of another version of the Bible, which says
“The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.” Deuteronomy 24:16
'An Eye-Opening Biblical Narration'
By Ibn Anwar
Bismika Allahumma
The following is one of the most interesting Biblical stories I have came across. I thought I’d share it with the readers. Many Christians such as Sam Shamoun, Craig Winn and others simply love going around bad-mouthing the Qur’an, saying that it contains “perverted, nonsensical teachings”.
Let us have a glimpse of their “sensical” Bible.
“And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham [is] the father of Canaan. These [are] the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. And Noah began [to be] an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid [it] upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces [were] backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; the lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers.“ Genesis 9:18-25 - New version
Before I proceed further I would like to state for the record that Muslims are utterly shocked and offended that the Bible portrays great messengers of God as low-live drunkards.
Coming back to the story, notice how the story says Ham, THE FATHER of Canaan. This is rather interesting. Seems like it’s trying to prove or lead to something.
In summary, Noah became drunk and dropped naked in his tent. Ham, Noah’s second son found him in that state and told his brothers about it. According to many Biblical experts, Ham didn’t just tell his brothers about it, he also laughed at his father’s state. This is considered as an offense to Noah and is the reason why Noah made the curse. The two other sons Shem and Japheth were ashamed of their father’s nakedness and covered him without looking. When Noah gained consciousness, he knew what Ham did and started cursing, “And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers.”
Did you catch the joke?
Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth.
Ham had four sons: Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan.
When the narration is analysed, a question arises: “Who was responsible for looking at Noah’s nakedness?” The answer is Ham. Christians argue that the action of Ham was a sin, hence the curse. For the sake of argument, we agree. Yet, who was responsible and thereafter cursed? Ham was responsible, but, who was made to pay? Was it Ham? No. Canaan, an innocent little child, was made to pay for the error of Ham. The father who is responsible was reprieved and the son who’s innocent was punished. Furthermore, why was Canaan out of four siblings singled out? Is this justice or madness?
Can you imagine something like that happening today? I love analogies, so let us have one.
James has four children. He committed murder. He is apprehended, brought to court and is found guilty. The judge decided that the punishment is the “injection”, i.e. death. However, the injection is given to his youngest son and he in turn is released without cost.
Once again, is this justice or madness? I leave the verdict to the readers.
In addition, read for yourself how blatantly the above strange tale of Genesis 9:18-25 contradicts the values of a narration of another version of the Bible, which says
“The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.” Deuteronomy 24:16
Really did Hazrat Noah drunk? I don't believe this. As bible is not in the real form now. there are lots of changes in it by people. This must be a fake story.
ReplyDeleteThe bible is now filled with corrupt ink of the priests. They change it to their will. May god bless you in your work sister.
ReplyDelete