FIRST: THOSE WHO WANT TO COMMENT ARE TO KEEP IN MIND THAT THEIR COMMENTS MUST BE BASED STRICTLY ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS ARTICLE. YOU MUST QUOTE THE AUTHOR AND THEN DISCUSS THE SPECIFIC POINTS WITH REFERENCES TO THE QURAN OR HISTORICAL DATA OR LOGIC. YOUR REFERENCES MUST NOT INCLUDE ANOTHER HADITH. ONE HADITH CANNOT TESTIFY FOR ANOTHER HADITH JUST AS ONE THIEF CANNOT TESTIFY FOR ANOTHER THIEF IN A COURT OF LAW. THAT WOULD BE FELONY.
SECONDLY: ANY COMMENTS DIRECTED PERSONALLY AT THE AUTHOR OR THEIR COLLEAGUES WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY AT MODERATION. ZERO TOLERANCE FOR ANY SUB-STANDARD APPROACH INVOLVING PERSONAL ATTACKS, INSULTS OR ACCUSATIONS. YOU MUST KEEP YOUR QUESTIONS OR STATEMENTS COMPLETELY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THIS HADITH, WHY SUCH A FALSEHOOD WAS NARRATED AND COMPILED AND WHY DO THE HADITH LOVERS PRESERVE IT IN THEIR "SAHIH" COLLECTIONS. I REPEAT, NO ANTAGONISM TO INCITE A FIGHT, AND NO OUT-OF-CONTEXT LECTURING. EITHER MENTION WHY THIS HADITH WAS NARRATED/COMPILED OR SIMPLY SHUT UP.
I got the following information from a visitor to my blog.
Such rude insults hurled at our great Prophet (sw) are unforgivable. The one I'm quoting here is one of the many blood boilers from the false Hadith literature, reading which, it's not easy for a sincere believer to keep their cool. After reading such Ahadith I ask myself, why do the mainstream Muslims get offended when crooks like Salman Rushdie or some Danish cartoonist insult the Prophet (sw)? How much do their own heroes a.k.a. "companions" or "sahabas" and their own imams respected the Prophet (sw)?
I quote the Hadith as quoted by the blog visitor along with his comments:
I would like to have comments and clarifications from Hadith lovers regarding the under pasted narration from Bukhari. It has been translated by University of South California. The translator has used respectable words. In the original Arabic the words are offensive and abusive.
BUKHARI Volume 7, Book 63, Number 182:
Narrated Abu Usaid:
We went out with the Prophet to a garden called Ash-Shaut till we reached two walls between which we sat down. The Prophet said, "Sit here," and went in (the garden). The Jauniyya (a lady from Bani Jaun) had been brought and lodged in a house in a date-palm garden in the home of Umaima bint An-Nu'man bin Sharahil, and her wet nurse was with her. When the Prophet entered upon her, he said to her, "Give me yourself (in marriage) as a gift." She said, "Can a princess give herself in marriage to an ordinary man?" The Prophet raised his hand to pat her so that she might become tranquil. She said, "I seek refuge with Allah from you." He said, "You have sought refuge with One Who gives refuge. Then the Prophet came out to us and said, "O Abu Usaid! Give her two white linen dresses to wear and let her go back to her family."
Would some Hadith lover explain the purpose of such false defamation of a person who was chosen by Allah as the final Messenger in this world?
The losers from Persia knew that they will never be able to alter or manipulate the Holy Quran because Allah Almighty has said that "WE have sent it down and WE are its Protectors." So they chose to write books which would divide Muslims in the coming generations. Until today the people who have never even seen the book of Bukhari, let alone reading it, quote the narrations with confidence and without shame.
This is called 'Hadith conspiracy and distortion of Islam,' as Brother Muhammad Asadi very correctly puts it. These young loafers who acquired the title of "sahabas" through their gross political manipulations had never even seen the Prophet (sw), let alone meeting him. The claims of people like Abu Huraira, Anas bin Malik, Abu Dharr, Abu Darda etc. etc. is to have lived in Medinah as the contemporary of the Prophet (sw) for a couple of years, three years at most. During these three years they were strangers to the Prophet (sw) and then a few years later after the Prophet (sw) passed away, they suddenly became the Prophet's "companions." If this is what companionship means, we need to return to school to learn the new definition of that term. Not to mention, the narrator of this Hadith, Abu Usaid, is totally unknown even in the list of sahabas in Wikipedia put up by the mainstream "ulemas."
As is obvious to anyone, the purpose of this scheming Hadith is:
(1) To make the Prophet (sw) look like a womanizer as if he had nothing to do but to go about meeting women and proposing to them.
(2) To make it appear that inspite of being chosen by Allah Almighty as His Final Messenger, the Prophet (sw) was an ordinary man and thus his marriage proposal was rejected.
(3) To discreetly mock the Noble Quran that Allah's choice was not correct. In the Quran, Allah addresses the Prophet (sw) as having a "tremendous nature."
"And lo! thou art of a tremendous nature." (68:4) Noble Quran - Surah Al Qalam.
There are several more Verses where Allah Almighty expresses his recognition of the Prophet's exemplary character. But unfortunately the so-called Muslims of later times had fallen so low that the Noble Quran was as foreign to them as another planet. The depravity and ignorance of the pre-Islamic days of Jahiliya had gotten the better of these men who had no qualms maliciously maligning the greatest man in the world and attributing unspeakable lies to him in order to alter the Laws of the Quran and to use the misquotes and misdeeds attributed to the Prophet (sw) as leverage to condone their own violations.
If anyone wants to see the online source of this mean gossip, visit this link: