So much fuss over a heavy pile of dirty looking rocks on a dismal field! Additionally and more importantly, Stonehenge is a suspicious monument with abounding questions concerning its authenticity.
~ Gasp !! ~
It's more or less an open secret that Stonehenge is more than partially reconstructed. Gradual process of its reconstruction has been going on since the 1700s. There have been hush-hush reports of renovation works at Stonehenge in the 1950s. In the 1960s, many of those stones now seen as massive monolith slabs of standing rocks were reconstructed.
Throughout the first millennium, many smaller stones were pilfered or moved to be used for other purposes in different locations.
The seemingly confident assertions of archeologists and historians in guidebooks and websites are in fact, inconclusive thoughts and ideas they arrived at after confused debates and indecisions. There is no such thing as "original" Stonehenge. Over the period of thousands of years until the mid 20th century, it has been tampered with, rearranged, removed and replaced.
Very few would like being told all of this. Obviously no modernist wants to think they have been duped, and that the "great monument" they have been raving about is a ruse. But that's a different matter. Stonehenge is definitely and largely fake. The story tellers have been deftly silent about the controversial side of it otherwise tourists won't flock around "Stonehenge," the bulky mess may not be easy to clear and history would appear less sensational.
MORE DETAILS HERE