-------------- --------------- -------------- --------

"O you who believe! Be careful of your duty to Allah, and be with the truthful." [Noble Quran 9:119]

"If you obeyed most of those on earth they would mislead you far from Allah's way." [Noble Quran 6:116]

Return to the QURAN only - the complete and final STAND-ALONE Divine Message which also contains the authentic sunnah of the beloved Prophet Muhammad (SAAW)


I bear witness that NONE is worthy of worship except ALLAH, He has NO partner nor partners, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the slave and Final Messenger of Allah.


Zainabs Lounge blog tracker

Thursday, December 31, 2015

The new joke fresh from the White House: U.S. not for regime change in Syria ..

                                 Image from:  The Brics Post

John Kerry's farewell to 2015 was expressed by a sloppy mincing of words.  He stated to the Russian press that the U.S. isn't seeking regime change any longer. In the same breath the jerkface says Assad must go because he is "a magnet for terrorists" and has no place "in the country's long-term future."  There we go again .... back to square one !! So who the heck is supposed to decide whether or not Assad is suitable for Syria's long-term future, the Syrian people OR the White House, 10 Downing Street and Elysee Palace ??   That's where this lout thinks he is fooling the world with his deceptive u-turn.

Kerry claims that the United States with the help of Russia wants to "stabilize" Syria and "destroy Daesh, a terrorist organization" .... and then refers to Assad as a "magnet for terrorists."   Get his bloody point?   Needless to reiterate, it has always been U.S., U.K. and E.U. that fed and fattened Daesh into a wealthy and prosperous terror organization to topple Assad, and now those same bunch of demonic sponsors are trying to pair up Assad with Daesh.  The hidden intent is to switch favor from terrorists to terrorists - from Daesh to groups like Ahrar as-Sham and Jaish (aka "moderate Syrian rebels") - to re-initiate regime change in Syria in 2016.  Imperialist guile isn't just repugnant .. it's a shame to humanity.

The other vital question is:  Will love for the White House return into Putin's heart and blur his vision, stepping on the carpet of coagulated shit laid for him by Mr. Kerry?

 Fact check:  RT

Friday, December 25, 2015

David Duke | Take a peek at the enemy's enemy beneath the facade.

Many among us have trusted David Duke for years because of his anti Zionist approach.   But we've never bothered to think seriously that when a white supremacist wrangles with a Zionist or a pro-Zionist, what do we Muslims benefit from that?   Pretty much NOTHING.
According to Duke, the traditions and heritage of America began with those known as the 'founders.'  However, America wasn't "founded."  It was invaded and grabbed by roving European pirates after one of the most ghastly genocides in world history committed against the natives of the land later named 'America.'  And then, the descendants of those perpetrators kidnapped thousands of Africans from the coasts of West Africa, auctioned them in American slave-markets like cattle n sheep to toil on stolen lands that flourished into rich plantations.   That’s America’s heritage.  At present Duke is rightly upset by the lack of "diversity" because he sees those who 'founded' America to be replaced by the Ashkenazi Jewish elites who are only 2% of the population.  Sure that's not "diversity."  Yet, Duke makes no bones about the fact that he has a problem with just about everyone who is not European-American.  Or put it this way:  Religion + color = white Caucasian Christian Europeans is what this former KKK grand wizard is hankering after for it's impossible he isn't aware that those 2% Ashkenazis politically occupying America are white Caucasian Europeans too.
With his quirky ideas on "diversity,"  David Duke wholeheartedly supports Donald Trump's stance on deporting all undocumented immigrants.  Dumping his personal views on the American people, Duke considers the entire system of immigration to be a threat to America's tradition and economy.  The world has been appalled at Trump's idea of banning the entry of Muslims in America.  Duke is one of the few who never denounced this ugly rhetoric.  He admits he does not endorse Donald Trump, asserting that the latter is too pro-Zionist for his liking.  In the same breath Duke gleefully sees Trump as a patriot who talks about American history and culture, waking up "the non-Jewish European-Americans." 

Do such uncanny aspirations on awakening distinguish this fake opponent of Zionism from Donald Trump or Benyamin Netanyahu in any positive light?

We Muslims need to come out of our emotional insecurity, get real and accept that enemy's enemy is NOT necessarily a friend.

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Hadith says a nation ruled by woman will not succeed

As-salaam Alaikum sisters and brothers  Smiley  Welcome to another huge discrepancy in the Hadith literature.  This looks to be a celebrity hadith as it's preserved by almost all collections.

It says:  "Never will succeed such a nation as lets their affairs carried out by a woman." (Bukhari, Maghazi, 82, Fitan, 18; Tirmidhi, Fitan, 75; Nasai, Qudat, 8; Ahmad b. Hanbal, V, 43, 51, 38, 47).

This Hadith site where I found the narration probably felt too ashamed to mention the name of the narrator .. but I presume it is that little known guy named Abu Bakra.  For long I mixed him up with Abu Bakr Siddiq - my profuse apology for that - Abu Bakr Siddiq was a great man and the first righteous Caliph.  This Abu Bakra is most likely a fictitious name concocted either by the so-called sahaba clan during the early Ommayad period or by Bukhari & co. for the purpose of bundling up false narrations.

Hadith followers have tried to justify this hadith by saying that "the duty of judging necessitates having full view, being shrewd and having experience related to the incidents in life. The fact that the experience of women is less and that they are not involved in the incidents in life very much is very important."   To some extent this might have been applicable in the 7th century.  At present such ideas may exist in remote places of Afghanistan etc.  But otherwise, in most parts of the world this explanation is completely null & void.  Most importantly it has no link with the Quran which narrates the event of a female queen (queen of Sheba or Saba) who embraced Islam in the era of Prophet Solomon and remained queen after embracing Tawheed.  This was hundreds of years before the 7th century.  Allah Almighty never mentions that queen of Saba had to step down as queen after becoming a Muslim (submitter).  Neither did Prophet Solomon tell her nor suggest that she should step down as leader of her land after her conversion.  For reference please check Quranic Verses 27:22-44.

The Hadith institution's second argument is just as absurd.  They say, quote: "The judge needs to have some sessions with male scholars, witnesses, plaintiffs and defendants. It is forbidden for a woman to have a session with men for fear of mischief."   I have no idea what these people are trying to say.   Witnesses who testify in courts can be men and women as per Quranic rules (more on this aspect in a while).  Plaintiffs and defendants can surely be of either gender.  Which law demands that a judge needs some sessions only with male scholars?  Moreover if a judge has any sessions with plaintiff or defendant, it has to be in the presence of their attorneys.  Not that there is anything wrong for a woman to talk business with a judge alone.  Have you ever heard of a judge sexually assaulting a female plaintiff or defendant alone in a courtroom?  Let us not be silly.  If a judge ever did that, it would be a very isolated incident by a sick judge who would be barred from practicing his profession ever again in his lifetime.

The third argument of the Hadithists attempts to use Verse 2:282 (about two female witnesses) to deem women unsuitable as leaders even though this Verse has NOTHING to do with leadership, be it man or woman.   Quoting the Hadith site as follows:

Allah states one of the features of women regarding witnessing as follows: "And get two witnesses, out of your own men And if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her " (al-Baqara, 2/282). Therefore, women are not deemed appropriate for the post of a president or a governor.

Well?  So what?   How does this Verse reject women from becoming leaders has not been explained.

The Noble Quran instructs two female witnesses only in the matter of writing debt transactions, nothing else.  If a woman becomes president or prime minister, she won't be required to do menial jobs like serving as witness for signing a debt contract or any deal/agreement for that matter.  All of that will be taken care of by other cabinet members.  Moreover, even if she is required to serve as a witness for a debt contract, why would it be difficult to find another lady to accompany her with the job?  It would not.  So the hadith supporters' argument of two female witnesses for disallowing female leadership is totally senseless and has no bearing on Quranic contents whatsoever.

Now here is the anti-climax.  If you check that Hadith site you will find that after a while the Hadithists themselves give up putting lipstick on trash.  The site writes "However, the reasons given above may be insignificant for the believing women who were educated in accordance with Islamic criteria, who have a good command of law ....."  It also states, quote: "The judgment made by the Turkish Higher Committee for the Religious Affairs is as follows: 'In Islam, there is no discrimination between men and women because they are humans; both are responsible for the orders and prohibitions of Allah. All people, whether men or women, are responsible for improving the earth and worshipping Allah.' "    Hence, in other words, the Hadith institution has itself rejected that mad, bad, illogical and FALSE hadith by Abu Bakra (or whoever) but funnily enough it persists to exist in collections called "sahih."   It's preserved despite the acknowledgement of its nonsensical contents.  Applause !!   So much for the common sense of our "scholars." 

This hadith thumper's stance on defending this weird and anti-Quranic hadith-narration was going nowhere.  He was too afraid to discard the hadith so he stamps his own reasons for explaining the hadith as "insignificant" for educated believing women.  That goes far enough to discreetly admit that this hadith is not worthy of believing educated women.

Saturday, December 5, 2015

Qatar and the neutralist Lebanese Government - the latest quid pro quo

More Al Qaeda terrorists have been freed from prison to fight in Syria.

On December 1, 2015 there was a prisoner swap negotiated between Qatar (home of the financiers of "Muslim Brotherhood") and the government of Lebanon. Twenty-six Al Qaeda prisoners were in the custody of Lebanese authorities. Last summer, Al-Nusra capt
ured 16 Lebanese soldiers. These 16 captives were released by AQ to buy the freedom of 26 terrorists with the help of Qatar, to be sent to Syria.

One of the 26 terrorists released from Lebanese prison is Saja al-Dulaimi, known in terror circles as the "Scheming bride of ISIL who inspires girls." She's the wife (or former wife) of IS chief al-Baghdadi. Reportedly she commands tremendous influence over the entire terror network. She was caught in Lebanon in 2014 trying to escape with false documents, huge sums of money and gold to fund terrorists. Another one of the 26 notorious terrorists freed from Lebanese prison is Mustafa Hujairi whose job was to provide logistical support to ANF and ISIL with more than 200 men under his command.

Could Qatar and Lebanon work on such a deal without the consent of the United States? This isn't simply a matter of 26 more terrorists added to the frontline. It's about the hidden resources and connections of the top guns recently freed. Is it necessary to say how such deals wouldn't have a long-term positive impact on strengthening the terror framework?

Russia and Turkey apparently on a collision course, the terror high-command inside Kulliye in Ankara has suffered a major setback. The panic-stricken CIA needs new ratlines to add more vigor to this war. Irrespective of changing conditions, it's a standing order from the Empire's big boss at Tel Aviv that Bashar al-Assad must go. That has kept the poor Empire frantically on its feet since the past 5 years.